IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI
PRINCIPAL
REGISTRY
BETWEEN:
FLORENCE L NGUWENI on her own behalf and on behalf
Of GRACE MAMBALA (deceased) and other dependants
PLAINTIFF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ……………………………DEFENDANT
Movette,
Counsel for the plaintiff
This is
this court’s order on assessment of damages for loss of expectation of life and
loss of dependency of the plaintiff on her deceased mother Grace Mambala. The deceased died in a road accident caused
by a government vehicle MG 172R.
A default
judgment for the damages alluded to above was entered in favour of the
plaintiff dated 7th February, 2004.
The deceased herein died aged 58 years on 6th May, 1996. She was survived by the plaintiff her
daughter aged 32 years at that time and her son Charles aged 28 years at the
time of the demise of the deceased.
The
deceased’s monthly income is uncertain but she was getting income from several
sources. She was a ward councilor and a
grocer. Counsel appeared not to have
endeavored to help her client get
evidence in that regard. This results
in injustice, and great difficulty in assessing damages due. The manner of pleading herein also leaves a
lot to be desired. There are no
particulars of negligence alleged although a default judgment was subsequently
entered. The names of the decease’s
dependants were also not spelt out in the pleadings. There is no full statement of claim. This is a serious lapse of attention to pleadings by
Counsel. Whatever the case this court
shall first deal with the claim for loss of expectation of life. The starting point has been the average life
expectancy of Malawians as indicated by the National Statistical office. This average life expectancy was recently
pegged below 50 years. This presents an
obvious difficulty the plaintiff having been aged over 50 years namely 58
years. This is one manifest problem
with statistics. This court is in spite
of this, of the view that the deceased herein should be given the allowance due
to her in terms of her life expectancy herein which is clearly above the
average. The deceased appeared to have
been enjoying a good health from the fact that at the time of her death she was
still able to tend to her garden. She
was involved in local government administration and in a grocery business..
This court is of the view that the deceased might have lived for some more
years. The deceased also appears
to have had a predominantly happy life
as can be seen from the activities she was engaged in. This is a predominant factor to be
considered on assessment of damages for loss of expectation of life. See Viscount Simon L.C inBenham v
Gambling [1941] A.C. 157.
Clearly the plaintiff herein is entitled to damages for loss of
expectation of life in the present action.
See Rose v. Ford [1937]
A.C.
And so
this court awards the plaintiff the sum of K100,000.00 as damages for loss of
expectation of life upon considering the circumstances outlined above. And now this court turns to deal with the
plaintiffs claim for loss of dependency.
In
arriving at damages for loss of dependency this court uses what can be termed
the multiplicand and multiplier formula.
See Mallet v. McMonagle [1970] A.C. 166. The multiplicand
being the decease’s monthly income whereas the multiplier is the deceased’s
approximated number of years she would have live were it for the wrongful
death. The multiplicand is multiplied
by the multiplier and the figure of 12 representing the number of months in a
year and personal reducing the product by ⅓ to representing personal
expenditure by the deceased. The
monthly income of the deceased was not specifically spelt out in evidence. That is an obvious difficulty. But this court is of the view that from the
decease’s activities she must at least
have earned a minimum monthly income equivalent to that of a domestic
worker as proveded by the Minimum Wages Regulations under the Employment Act. That is not less than K1,500.00. This court shall in the circumstances of the
present case adopt that sum as the multiplicand.
For the
multiplier, having due regard to the deceased’s age and all the surrounding
circumstances of her life this court adopts a multiplier of 5.
And the
level of dependency therefore works out as follows:
K1,500 x
12 x 5 x ⅔, which comes up to K60,000.00. This sum awarded to the plaintiff as damages for loss of
dependency. The total award herein is
therefore K160,000.00
The
dependants of the deceased Florence and Charles shall each get K80,000.00.
Costs are
for the plaintiffs.
Made in
Chambers at Blantyre this June, 2004
M A Tembo